According to AACS the circumvention software was still being offered and promoted though new domains and services.įor example, new circumvention tools and services were offered from, ,, , and, among others. “It is well-established that the Copyright Act doesn’t apply extra-territorially,” the company argued, asking the court to quash the injunction or limit it to the United States.ĪACS contested the good intentions of DVDFab and showed the court that the software was still readily available to the U.S. One of the counterarguments DVDFab raised was that the DMCA’s anti-circumvention provisions don’t apply worldwide, and DVDFab was promising to no longer do business with U.S. However, after the injunction was issued the company responded in the name of Feng Tao, with a request for the court to revise its earlier judgment. Initially DVDFab did not respond to the court, so the order was entered by default. It won a preliminary injunction based on the argument that the “DVDFab Group” violates the DMCA’s anti-circumvention clause, since their software can bypass DVD encryption. The company sued the makers of popular DVD ripping software DVDFab. Last year the decryption licensing outfit AACS launched a crackdown on DRM-circumvention software.

Dvdfab cn products